[PROPOSAL] [AUTOPASS] Territorial Custodianship Claim for Sabbat Coordinator
Proposal Type: Other Public
Opened: 27-Nov-2017 11:55PM EST
Closing: 28-Nov-2017 11:55PM EST
I Jackie Clark in my duties as Sabbat Coordinator would like to request the following county as Sabbat Coordinator territory. As we move forward we plan to promote story focused on the west coast that will ideally be shaped by the players. This is in a effort to give a foot hold location that is outside of the org stories that are connected to San Diego for this office to use to help form story for any or all of the west coast games or beyond to enjoy and help shape their region. We intend to allow players to decide the fate of this territory through future stories we will be propping. Further, this will allow us to host scenes for those wishing to interact with the Cardinal of the West Coast.
Coordinator Bylaws 3.C.iii.5 states:
Coordinators may lay claim to territories in order to preserve or uphold the status quo established by the canon material, or due to Council-approved plot-lines or other such world-events
Claiming new or modifying existing territories is considered something that affects multiple Chronicles and must be brought to the OWbN Council independent of other proposals.
Coordinators may propose sole control of a territory, or joint control with other Coordinators, specified in the proposal.
After a territory claim has passed a vote of the OWbN Council, the territory will be added to the Territory List posted on the OWbN website.
Each claim must include the proposed levels of restriction for each category of the territory.
These categories are as follows:
Character backgrounds / back-stories: Approval, Notify, or None.
Use in Game-play: Approval, Notify, or None.
These categories may be further specified, if desired, by creature type (for example: Vampires, Mages, Changing Breeds, Wraith) and/or Sect.
The level of restriction for at least one of these categories (either Backgrounds or Game-play) must be Coordinator Notification or Coordinator Approval; a Coordinator may not lay claim to a territory which has "None" specified for both character backgrounds and game-play. Such areas are covered in the Administrative Bylaws, Section 1.B.iii.
I propose the attached Territories be claimed by the Sabbat Coordinator's office. Disposition and supporting justification for each Territory is below. I have included Conditional Approval Parameters per Council Committee feedback, accounting for the difference in travel frequency between the various supernatural species. Disposition and supporting justification for each Territory is described below.
Location: USA - Ventura County, California
Geographical Specifics of Responsibility: County-wide control
Joint Approval: No
Conditional Approval Parameters - Vampire Backgrounds: Coordinator Notify
Conditional Approval Parameters - Vampire Actions: Coordinator Approval
Conditional Approval Parameters - Changing Breed/Changeling/Mage Backgrounds: Coordinator Approval
Conditional Approval Parameters - Changing Breed/Changeling/Mage Actions: Coordinator Notify
Conditional Approval Parameters - Other Supernatural Backgrounds: Coordinator Approval
Conditional Approval Parameters - Other Supernatural Actions: Coordinator Approval
General Restriction Level (Default Level unless otherwise noted in Conditional Approval Parameters Columns): Coordinator Notify
Note: This proposal does not require a second, and will autopass if no objection is made.
Genre Coordinators must pass before Council any plot, R&U bylaw revision, R&U named characters, territory requests, in character enforced policy, or in character binding edict they wish to use which they can reasonably expect to affect multiple chronicles and these proposals need not be seconded, but go immediately into discussion.
If no opposition is voiced during the week of discussion, the proposal is considered passed and enforceable. Once passed these are considered binding to all chronicles and a chronicles refusal to adhere is grounds for OWBN disciplinary measures. Opposition must be in regards to the content of the proposal and must give those reasons why the objection is voiced. This is to allow Coordinator's the opportunity to respond and/or make changes/remove the proposal and its contents.
File / Document: No file attachments for this vote.Ballot Options